Detroit, Texas and the Post-Indy Predicament

Let’s start with something positive. Thanks to the presence of Fernando Alonso, the 101st Indianapolis 500 magically got the bump it needed to avoid a post-100th birthday hangover. Alonso was the compelling story this year’s race would otherwise have been lacking and he and McLaren Technology Group CEO Zak Brown delivered in a big way, certainly on an international level.

Alonso at Indy (John Oreovicz)

If the Indianapolis Motor Speedway successfully produced an encore to the hundredth Indy 500, the IndyCar Series is still struggling to figure out the best way to follow up the month of May at Indianapolis – period.

I want to like the Detroit Grand Prix, or to use its full and proper title, Roger Penske and Corporate Detroit bring you the Chevrolet Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix INDYCAR Dual in Detroit presented by Lear Corporation.

I want to believe that it’s the best place the IndyCar Series could be the weekend after the Indianapolis 500, a venue that showcases the versatility and talent of Indy car drivers, teams and cars.

But it’s not. And no matter how hard Penske and his powerful corporate partners want you to believe, it never will be.

Penske often talks about delivering value to his shareholders, but the bottom line is that the Detroit GP offers little value to the IndyCar Series.

Then there’s Texas Motor Speedway, which is a problem for INDYCAR in a very different way.

TMS president Eddie Gossage desperately wants the post-Indy date, and from my standpoint, it makes sense to run another oval coming out of Indy. It would lighten the workload on the crews and provide some kind of continuity for three million casual fans who apparently watch the ‘500’ every year on TV yet fail to tune in for next week’s race(s).

Texas is a beautiful racetrack, with spectacular views and top-notch accommodations for fans and the media. The facility as a whole is second to none, and the PR staff does a tremendous job representing the track and the market.

The problem – and it’s not restricted to Texas – is the fundamental notion of Indy cars racing on high-banked 1.5-mile tracks. I believe it is unacceptably dangerous.

Since 1997, through IRL, CART, Champ Car and INDYCAR sanction, nobody has been able to figure the right combination of horsepower, mechanical grip and aerodynamic downforce that will create a happy medium between thrilling (but extremely hazardous) pack racing and boring single-file shows.

Texas has become the scapegoat because these days it’s the only high-banked oval on the schedule. But the problem would be the same at Las Vegas, Charlotte, Kentucky or any other high-banked intermediate track. INDYCAR has comprehensively failed to work out a safe way to race at that kind of venue without going too far on the side of conservatism and winding up with a spread out parade.

(Scott R. LePage/LAT for Chevy Racing)

Since the very first IRL race at Texas in June 1997, pack races involving Indy cars have scared the hell out of me. I remain convinced that, eventually, a car is going to be launched into the grandstands with unthinkable results.

I fully understand that the same thing could happen at Indianapolis, or at any road or street course for that matter. I just think the odds are a lot greater when a dozen cars are running inches apart side by side and nose to tail at 220 mph, almost always in a corner and with no escape route.

There’s a vocal group of fans that loves pack racing, but I don’t think they truly understand just how dangerous what they are cheering for has the potential to be.

These fans – and a few unnamed IndyCar Series drivers – are the people Sebastien Bourdais was referring to when he gave some extraordinary quotes to David Malsher of

Bourdais at Surfers Paradise, 2004 (Paul Webb)

“Back in the day, particularly when Dan [Wheldon] died, we told ourselves that we would never do that style of racing again. And actually, as far as I’m concerned, Texas last weekend is not even the first time we’ve done it since then. We’ve done it at Fontana in 2015 and in a couple of other places,” Bourdais said.

“I keep hearing and reading comments that I feel in disbelief about; people saying, ‘This was awesome! This was such a great show!’ and I’m like, ‘Man, oh man, people are suffering short-memory syndrome, big time.’

“If we haven’t proved to ourselves that we can’t do stock car-style racing with open-wheel cars without putting drivers’ lives at risk to a massive amount, then clearly we haven’t learned anything and we’re just delusional. I’d just like people to tell it straight – ‘This was a big mistake, we’re just really glad that we made it through, and let’s never make this mistake again.’ But that’s not what I’m reading. I’m reading, ‘How great was that?!’

“It’s not all about the show. It’s about making sure that we can race, and race hard but don’t put the drivers and teams and series in a spot where we shouldn’t be. It’s all fun and games until somebody dies. And then what?

“As soon as that green flag dropped, I was holding my phone and shaking, praying that nobody would get hurt. That is not how these races should be.”

I’m in 100 percent agreement with Bourdais. And to his credit, he has always felt this way about high-downforce oval racing and he is NEVER afraid to tell the truth as he sees it.

I was at Eurospeedway Lausitz in 2003 when Bourdais won in his oval track debut. It wasn’t a pack race, but in an effort to save costs, CART basically ran road course aero on the 2.0-mile low-banked oval and the high downforce level allowed the cars to run very close together. In my report for National Speed Sport News, I called Bourdais’ dice for the lead with Mario Dominguez (as well as Bruno Junqueira and Michel Jourdain Jr.) “sometimes frightening in its intensity.”

Seb thought the style of racing was stupid then and said he was glad they only had to do it once a year. And his viewpoint remains the same.

The other factor that feeds into the “Texas problem” is that modern racing fans have come to want or demand a closely packed field with lots of passing and a photo finish every week. Those are unrealistic expectations.

For one thing, in a pack race where everyone is running foot-to-the floor flat out, passing is theoretically impossible. A pass demands one car to be faster than another, and if every car is maxed out, how can one of them go faster?

I find it more exciting to watch a driver work his way through the pack from 20th place to first, even if it means passing a single-file train, because it’s a clear display of skill and a fast car. One year at Milwaukee, Al Unser Jr. qualified something like 17th, and it took him just 30 laps to take the lead. It was a beautiful thing to see.

A few years ago, Mauricio Gugelmin shared his thoughts with me on this subject, and his words still ring true.

Montoya and Gugelmin, Milwaukee 1999 (Michael L. Levitt, LAT USA)

“I remember when we ran the 240 mph laps at California Speedway people were saying, ‘You’re crazy to drive at that speed!’ But we had a car that was designed to run at those speeds that was well balanced with small wings and we didn’t hurt people,” Gugelmin said.

“Yes, maybe it wasn’t as close as some people would like to see. But we still had some very good racing and I think people may have forgotten a little bit about what racing is all about. It has gone completely the other way and now in every series all they talk about is passing. Even Formula 1 got into that, and in America it’s even worse. They want to see that last-lap dash to the line, but when you get highly competitive people that close together in open-wheel cars, you’re going to run into trouble.

“You can have good stewards who do a good job of controlling the drivers and making sure they respect each other, but when the old ‘red mist’ drops, you’re going to have problems. Like an airplane accident, a racing crash usually doesn’t happen unless there are a number of factors involved. Somebody takes their air, they drop a wheel on the grass, and there they go. The cars are too much on the edge.

“I hope some of the drivers have the courage to step up and say this is unacceptable.”

That’s what Bourdais is doing. And what reaction does he expect?

“Oh yeah, I know I’ll be seen as the dick for saying all this, but I’ll deal with that. That’s fine,” he told Malsher.

Newman/Haas pit stop, Zolder 2007 (John Oreovicz)

“If we have not yet learned our lessons from these types of races, then what is it going to take? How many times are we going to need to do that? How many millions of dollars do we need to throw away to finally understand that this type of racing is something we can’t do? I don’t know. I’m almost speechless when I read the comments – good or bad – that some of the drivers make which just miss the point.

“What happened on Saturday has got nothing to do with anything other than the aerokits have put us in a spot where we cannot run the appropriate amount of downforce to create separation. We need to run that little amount of downforce that we aren’t flat all the way around, so we aren’t two-wide, six-deep for a whole lap, lap after lap.

“What I worry about is that I don’t see anyone acknowledging we’ve done wrong, so we can’t identify what we’ve done wrong and so we don’t identify how to fix it. If you’re in denial that there’s a problem then you’re not going to identify what the problem is, so then how do you find the solution? You don’t.”

As Bourdais added, the introduction of a new aerodynamic philosophy with the body and floor being designed for the 2018 spec IndyCar is a golden opportunity to get the basic power-to-mechanical and aerodynamic grip ratio right at Texas and every other venue on the schedule. It’s encouraging that the test and development drivers are expected to be Oriol Servia and Juan Pablo Montoya, drivers with nearly 20 years of experience in both high- and low-downforce Indy cars.

Renderings of the “new” car show that it looks the business. Let’s just hope INDYCAR can make it drive as good as it looks.

One final thought on following up the Indianapolis 500: If the powers-that-be insist on racing the very next weekend, Texas deserves the slot more than Detroit. But I think the IndyCar Series needs to be realistic about moving on to somewhere else in the near future if racing at Texas can’t be made safer and less artificially competitive. It’s worth noting too that crowds at the track are about a third of what they were in the heyday, maybe 30,000 tops.

(Scott R. LePage/LAT for Chevy Racing)

The answer may lie less than 300 miles away at Circuit of the Americas. It may be a road course, but it’s a fast one with a high standard of presentation that would make the series look good. Eddie Gossage has made clear that TMS and COTA cannot co-exist on the IndyCar schedule, so a hard decision may be looming for all parties not too far down the line.


  1. Tim Strauss says:

    Word’s well said

  2. Kyle Miller says:

    Great read John. As you’ve laid out in the above article, IndyCar HAS to figure out how to better capitalize on the post Indy 500 buzz. Detroit is the worst circuit in the series right now (and I thought the same back in the 90s), so it’s just such a buzz kill. I would obviously rate the Indy 500 as the top event on the schedule, but my other events in the top 5 would be Road America, Watkins Glen, Long Beach, and Barber. If Texas is not the first event after the 500 (and I too hope the 2018 spec car fixes the racing there), then maybe Road America can fill the void. I also think the week after Indy should be idle to kind of bask in the glow of the 500 and to also give everyone a mini break. To me, Indy and Road America are the best places to showcase Indy cars. I’m very thankful that both Road America and Watkins Glen were added the schedule last year. They instantly added more credibility to the series.

  3. Jim says:

    I want to see Texas stay and I hope with the new aerokits will make a better race. I like the balance that Indycar wants between Road, Street, and Ovals and I never want to see that die. I’ll wait until 2018 to see if Texas is still a problem but I do agree with you that it should be after the Indy 500 and the Detroit usually is one of the worst street course races. I wish they would do a dual race in Toronto or somewhere else.

  4. Eddie Fish says:

    Wrong! What you call pack racing is the underdog teams with new young drivers getting a chance to run up front. Yes they are going to push it to the limit. Did we tell Chuck Yeager to slow down because people were dying. Look at all the lives that are being saved by hauns device after Dale Earnhardt died.if your worried like me you would write an article about how we need a better catch fence that doesn’t shred ‘s car to pieces. The rear view mirror, all the way to the safer barrier wall Indy has led the way for auto manufacturers all over the world to be able to develop new and safer ways for race car drivers, and fans to be safe in there car. We should never go to a race expecting a crash but when it does, we see the best in safety. And that includes advancements in medical response. I feel what you are saying, but I think we will soon see a replacement for the catch I said at the top sometimes when I hear what you are saying. I believe a lot of the top drivers start looking to pin it on something other than there performance. Step back and listen who is complaining. Be a Winner not a whiner!

  5. Oilpressure says:

    I am not a fan of Belle Isle being at any place on the IndyCar schedule, but especially not when it immediately follows the Indianapolis 500. What a momentum killer and way to run off curious and potential new fans who liked what they saw the week before. The traditionalist in me says to go back to Milwaukee, but empty stands don’t look good the following week either. Iowa perhaps? I’m not sure. I do think it should be an oval, however.

    As far as COTA goes, I think it’s time that IndyCar called Eddie Gossage’s bluff. The fact that F1 races there, puts IndyCar in a bad light if they don’t. It is one of, if not the premier road courses in North America. If IndyCar wants credibility in the racing world, they almost have to be at COTA; Eddie Gossage be damned. Personally, I think both could work and co-exist.